Glover has really specific criteria for sources that I didn't realize until now. But he has to realize, there was NO literature on my topic. NONE. Hopefully, he doesn't pay that much attention to where I got my information.........but he probably will.
I am running into the same problem with my Chaucer paper. This is stupid. Just plain stupid. A source is a source and that is that. Except, apparently not.
Today was a good decision.